The Federal Government has been funding the University-Based Industrial Training and Assessment Center (ITAC) program since 1976. The goal of this ITAC program is twofold: first, to help U.S. manufacturing competitiveness by providing assessments and recommendations to improve operations for small and medium-sized manufacturers/enterprises (SMEs), and second, to address a shortage of engineering professionals with applied energy and manufacturing-related skills by training engineering students through hands-on involvement in these assessments. To date, and under the direction of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) the University-Based ITAC program has provided more than 23,000 assessments and over 169,000 recommendations to enhance competitiveness of SME operations. On average, an ITAC assessment leads an SME to implement changes that reduce its energy use and/or improve productivity by 5-7%.
The University-Based ITAC program has long been characterized by its ability to adapt to changing needs of its clients and to incorporate advancing technologies and emerging policy priorities. In particular, the U.S. is currently facing a major workforce availability and readiness issue for addressing critical minerals and materials (CMM) supply chains. To meet surging demand and reduce dependency on foreign CMM, the U.S. will need more new and upskilled workers, from technicians and trades to advanced-degree specialists, and it will need them across the entire CMM supply chain.
Domestic mining operations face increasing pressure to reduce energy intensity, improve water efficiency and stewardship, enhance mineral recovery and process efficiency, address maintenance backlogs and aging infrastructure, and close workforce and technology capability gaps. At the same time, the mining workforce pipeline requires hands-on, systems level training that connects engineering fundamentals to real industrial constraints. DOE intends to leverage the extensive experience gained through operating the traditional ITAC program by expanding into the mining and mineral processing sectors, including, but not limited to CMMs.
The current 36 ITACs located across the country are completing their most recent five-year projects at the end of 2026. Through this Opportunity, DOE anticipates selecting the universities who will operate two types of ITACs for the next five-years – the traditional manufacturing ITACs (Track 1) and a new variant that focuses on mining and mineral processing operations (Track 2).
DOE’s Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation (CMEI) intends to provide opportunities for applicants across a range of four-year educational institutions that provide engineering degrees. Specifically, U.S. colleges or universities that have at least one of their four-year undergraduate programs accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission or the Technology Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). The applicants must be located within the engineering department that holds the accreditation and must be physically located in the U.S. Applicants can apply to either or both of the following two tracks.
The universities selected to operate Manufacturing ITACs under this Opportunity are expected to continue the traditional activity of providing technical assistance in the form of assessments to SMEs – currently defined as operating within Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 21 thru 39, having gross annual sales below $250M, fewer than 500 employees, and annual energy bills between $100,000 and $3.5M. The critical elements of the traditional University-Based ITACs are as follows:
The universities selected to operate these more specialized ITACs will focus on providing technical assistance to SMEs within SIC Codes 10 - 14, 32, and 33 (i.e., mining and mineral processing), having gross annual sales below $250M, and fewer than 500 employees.
Although the basic structure and operation of these ITACs are consistent with the traditional manufacturing ITACs, the clients to be served, the technical challenges they face, and the time required to evaluate and recommend potentials solutions to these challenges will likely increase the time required for technical assistance, as well as expand the academic disciplines of the participating students. The critical elements of the mining and mineral processing ITACs are as follows:
Submission Window: October 2, 2026 - October 30, 2026
Both Track 1 and Track 2 applications are due no later than October 30, 2026 at 3:00 PM ET
The University-Based ITAC Opportunity launched on October 2, 2026. Please see the announcement article for more information.
Informational Webinars: DOE will present and summarize the details of Track 1 and Track 2 University-Based ITAC Opportunity. Potential applicants will gain a better understanding of the Opportunity's scope, scale, and intent and have the opportunity to ask questions of DOE staff.

downloading the Microsoft Teams software to your computer, smartphone, or tablet.Phase 1 - University-Based ITAC Track 1 and Track 2 Submissions Open (October 2, 2026 - October 30, 2026)
Submission Window: October 2, 2026 - October 30, 2026
Both Track 1 and Track 2 applications are due no later than October 30, 2026 at 3:00 PM ET
Every applicant and sub-applicant(s) must meet the following eligibility requirements:
Please note that federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs) are eligible as sub-applicants, but will be funded outside of the PIA if selected.
Applications for University-Based ITAC Track 1 will be evaluated against the technical review criteria shown below. All sub-criteria are of equal weight.
Criterion 1: Project Management Approach (30%)
This criterion involves consideration of the following factors:
Criterion 2: Project Team and Past Performance (25%)
This criterion involves consideration of the following factors:
Criterion 3: Teaching, Training, Workforce Development, and Job Quality (30%)
This criterion involves consideration of the following factors:
Criterion 4: Project Resources (15%)
This criterion involves consideration of the following factors:
Applications for University-Based ITAC Track 2 will be evaluated against the technical review criteria shown below. All sub-criteria are of equal weight.
Criterion 1: Project Management Approach (30%)
This criterion involves consideration of the following factors:
Criterion 2: Project Team and Past Performance (25%)
This criterion involves consideration of the following factors:
Criterion 3: Teaching, Training, Workforce Development, and Job Quality (30%)
This criterion involves consideration of the following factors:
Criterion 4: Project Resources (15%)
This criterion involves consideration of the following factors:
A 20% cost share is required for any awardee (Tracks 1 and 2) under this solicitation. Awardees will be expected to provide documentation of their cost share. For details on eligible cost share expenses, please visit the FAQs.
Partnerships with other stakeholders are strongly encouraged, including formal sub-applicants and other implementation partners. All sub-applicants must meet the General Eligibility Requirements noted above.
DOE encourages responses to this solicitation that coordinate with, leverage, and build upon existing programs and entities, including:

DOE anticipates the maximum per center allocation will be $375,000 a year.
A complete application for Tracks 1 and/or 2 of this solicitation requires:
Additionally, the applicant must certify it is not owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of government of Country of Risk. DOE defines Country of Risk to include China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. This list is subject to change.
The project narrative cannot exceed 10 pages in total (excluding the cover page) using 12-point font and 1-inch margins. If an applicant elects to submit a proposal for multiple Tracks, the overall page limit for the project narrative is increased by 5 pages.
Any content exceeding 10 pages for one Track or 15 pages for two Tracks will not be considered by reviewers.
Note that the letters of commitment, and resumes DO NOT COUNT towards the page limit.
The table below outlines the content that should be in the project narrative.

If selected, performers will establish a business-to-business agreement with EnergyWerx and define project activities (e.g., tasks, milestones, deliverables) in a concise Statement of Effort (SOE) document. DOE also expects awardees to provide regular updates on progress through quarterly calls and concise reports, and to participate in peer-to-peer learning opportunities/workshops a few times per year.
Letters of Commitment
Submit letters of commitment from all sub-applicants and third-party cost share providers. If applicable, the letter must state that the third party is committed to providing a specific minimum dollar amount or value of in-kind contributions allocated to cost sharing. The following information for each third party contributing to cost sharing should be identified: (1) the name of the organization; (2) the proposed dollar amount to be provided; and (3) the proposed cost sharing type (cash or in-kind contributions).
Each letter must not exceed 1 page. Save the letters of commitment in a single PDF using the following convention for the title “LeadOrganization_LOCs”.
Letters of support or endorsement for the project from entities that do not have a substantive role in the project are not accepted or reviewed.
Resumes for Key Personnel
Applicants must submit a one-page resume for the Project Director and up to five additional senior/key personnel. The resumes should include the following:
Save resumes in a single PDF using the following convention for the title “LeadOrganization_Resumes”.