Workstream 1: Implementation Grants

This workstream involves collecting grant applications from SMMs to implement recommendations made in ITAC, CHP TAP,or qualified equivalent assessments that meet the eligibility and prioritization criteria described below.

Note: Eligible potential applicants must submit one (1) form FOR EACH FACILITY in which grant support is requested.

‍

Workstream 2: Third-Party Assessor Qualification

This workstream involves collecting applications from entities interested in having their assessments qualify as "equivalent to ITAC assessments" in accordance with 42 USC§17116(a)(2)(C), so that their eligible clients can apply for implementation grants.

Insert content here...

• October 19, 2023 from 1:00-2:00 PM ET: COMPLETED
• November 16, 2023 from 1:00-2:00 PM ET: COMPLETED
• December 7, 2023 from 1:00-2:00 PM ET: COMPLETED

To apply for an implementation grant, click here. (Next deadline: December 31, 2023, at 5pm ET.)‍

To apply for qualification as an “ITAC-equivalent” assessment provider, click here. (Next deadline: December 31, 2023, at 5pm ET.)

To learn more and apply for an ITAC assessment, click here.

To learn more and apply for a CHP TAP assessment, click here.

Workstream 1 Timeline (Estimated)

• Applications Open: October 6, 2023
• Office Hours (OH) Q&A Webinar: October 19, 2023, from 1:00-2:00pm ET, with additional sessions to follow roughly monthly.
• Application Deadline: Rolling (Quarterly review). Next deadline is December 31, 2023 at 5:00pm ET.
• Review and Selection: Quarterly, with next round of selections announced in early 2024.
• Awarding and Implementation: Selected SMMs will finalize awards with ENERGYWERX and begin implementation.

Workstream 2 Timeline (Estimated)

• Applications Open: October 6, 2023
• Office Hours (OH) Q&A Webinar: October 19, 2023, from 1:00-2:00pm ET, with additional sessions to follow roughly monthly.
• Application Deadline: December 31, 2023 at 5:00pm ET.
• Review and Selection: Early 2024.
• Awarding and Implementation: Selected assessment providers will be asked to sign a memorandum of understanding with DOE spelling out the terms of the qualification. Once the MOU is signed, eligible clients can apply for implementation grants.

Insert content here...

Applications in this round of funding must meet all of the following criteria:

• Applicant is a domestic entity [1]
• Applicant is a manufacturer – that is, an entity that engages in the mechanical, physical, or chemical transformation of materials, substances, or components; or, applicant is a water or wastewater treatment facility
• Applicant had gross annual sales of less than $100 million in the most recently completed fiscal year OR the year in which the assessment was completed (if different)
• Applicant annual energy bills were between $100,000 and $3.5 million in the most recently completed fiscal year OR the year in which the assessment was completed (if different)
• There were fewer than 500 of employees at the assessed plant site in the most recently completed fiscal year OR the year in which the assessment was completed (if different)
• All proposed projects address recommendation(s) made in an ITAC or CHP TAP assessment conducted since January 1, 2018, or another qualified assessment since January 1, 2021
• No proposed project efforts already have been implemented

Applications in this round of funding will be evaluated and prioritized using the following criteria:

Impact and Feasibility

• The degree to which the proposed project(s) has the potential to improve the assessed plant site’s energy efficiency and productivity
• The degree to which the proposed project(s) is likely to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (higher priority for projects that align with the goal of achieving a net-zero economy)
• The likelihood that the project will improve the applicant’s competitiveness, given the payback period and expected return on investment (cost savings/implementation cost) over a 10-year period after implementation
• The adequacy of the proposed project management approach, including the clarity of project scope, cost, work plan, and key milestones to ensure project objectives are met, as well as the availability of sufficient Project Manager and team time

Need for Financial Assistance and Cost Share‍

• The degree to which the applicant demonstrates the need for financial assistance to implement the proposed project, considering available funding sources, up front costs, and estimated payback period
• Whether the grant will supplement, not supplant, any private or State funds available to the eligible entity to carry out the covered project
• Whether the applicant leverages and demonstrate successful securement of alternative funding sources (e.g., Private Banks, State & Utility Programs, Energy Performance Saving Contracts, SBA) to carry out the covered project

In addition, DOE may consider portfolio-wide program policy factors in determining which full applications to select for awards, including:

• The degree to which the proposed project contributes to a diversity of applicant types and sizes of applicant organizations and represents diversity in the technical area when compared to the existing DOE project portfolio and other projects selected from this FOA.
• The degree to which the proposed project optimizes the use of available DOE funding to achieve programmatic objectives.
• The degree to which the project contributes to the overall portfolio’s impact on the strength of the American domestic manufacturing base across the nation.
• The degree to which the project will employ procurement of U.S. iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials.
• The degree to which the proposed project is likely to lead to increased high-quality employment and manufacturing in theUnited States.
• The degree to which the project focuses on repurposing, reusing, or decarbonizing existing industrial    infrastructure and/or facilities.
• The degree to which the proposed project, or group of projects, represent a desired geographic distribution (considering past awards and current applications).
• The degree to which the proposed project supports complementary efforts or projects, which, when taken together, will best achieve the statute’s goals, objectives, and direction.

Applications in this round of qualification must meet all of the following criteria:

• Applicant is a domestic entity (mandatory) [3]
• Applicant’s protocol and implementation recommendations are vendor-agnostic for implementation-related products and services
• Applicant’s assessments are not limited to one or a small set of technology areas or interventions
• Applicant is willing, if selected for qualification, to provide its assessment protocols and details on calculations when requested, and to interact with, DOE, the Industrial Training & Assessment Centers, and other key program stakeholders to share best practices and ensure quality

Applications in this round of qualification will be evaluated and prioritized using the following criteria:

• The degree to which the assessor demonstrates substantial experience with comprehensive industrial energy assessments [4], either longitudinally (through along-running track record of industrial energy assessments) or as a demonstrably major focus of recent work (e.g., at least 25-50% of assessments provided in the last two years)
• The degree to which assessments are free or demonstrably affordable to small- and medium-sized manufacturers
• The degree to which the assessor incorporates input from key site personnel (e.g.,Plant Manager, Energy Manager, Engineering Personnel) – including gathering pre-assessment data and input – to ensure its assessment is addressing specialized characteristics and challenges of assessed the site
• Whether the assessor executes assessments in person at plant sites, or conducts assessments virtually but with demonstrable equivalent efficacy to that of in-person assessments
• The degree to which the entity’s assessments generate final reporting that captures information and transparent calculations on (1) engineering and financial analysis of implementation costs and benefits, and (2) detailed overviews of plant operation, assessment activities, and identified recommendations

Note: Assessment results, and the associated recommendations, cost estimates, and benefits, should be based upon 1-2 years’ worth of actual utility data (electricity, gas, water, etc.) for the facility being assessed

• The degree to which the assessor demonstrates a commitment to the ITAC Program’s dual missions of (1) workforce development and (2) strengthening small- and medium-sized manufacturers, as well as a commitment to community and labor engagement; job quality
• The degree to which the assessor’s capabilities, client base, and/or geographic coverage helps extend, or fill important gaps in, the ITAC Network’s capacity and reach
• The indicated commitment of the assessor to conducting yearly follow-up surveys to collect implementation data as prescribed by the DOE (e.g., whether implementation occurred, actual implementation costs, realized energy savings, total reduction of GHG emissions, etc.), and to sharing survey results data with the DOE

Qualified third-party assessors are required to meet and maintain the eligibility criteria above and maintain a consistent level of performance on the review criteria above to maintain their qualification as a non-ITAC or DOE CHP assessor whose assessments will enable participating SMMs to receive ITAC Implementation Grants. DOE retains the prerogative to request renewal evaluations of, or additional information from, third-party assessors to ensure continued eligibility, quality, and ITAC equivalence.

[1] To qualify as a domestic entity, the entity must be organized, chartered or incorporated (or otherwise formed) under the laws of a particular state or territory of the United States; have majority domestic ownership and control; and have a physical place of business in theUnited States

[2] Minority owned business is defined as a business of which not less than 51% is owned by one or more individuals who are: (A) citizens of the U.S.; and (B) Asian American, NativeHawaiian, Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, or Alaska Native.

[3] To qualify as a domestic entity, the entity must be organized, chartered or incorporated (or otherwise formed) under the laws of a particular state or territory of the United States; have majority domestic ownership and control; and have a physical place of business in theUnited States

[4] “Energy assessments” refer to assessments that are conducted to improve industrial energy efficiency, material efficiency, productivity, or reduce greenhouse gas emissions and non-green house gas pollution.